![]() The overall quality of -V0 is likely to be on a par with or better than -b320.Īnyway, both settings might be more than you need the way to check this is to, as suggested, perform ABX tests on these and lower settings across a representative set of tracks from your library. There have been several past discussions on the two settings, on which LAME settings are generally transparent, on ABXing, etc. ![]() you may be able to get more information by searching for those (using the built-in Google bar) than by waiting for users who feel like retreading the same ground again. To answer your question simply, TECHNICALLY CBR would be better but VBR saves you even more space by only using your selected bitrate when necessary, rather than applying it all throughout, even when there is barely even any sound. Also, the difference in sound quality between the max 320 KB/s and V0 (which is at around 244 KB/s) will not be noticeable. I doubt there's anyone that would be able to hear the difference between the two regardless of the level of equipment unless there are strong measures in place to make that difference more distinguishable. In summary, there is no really perceivable difference between V0 and 320 CBR so I wouldn't even worry about it. ![]() Just use V0 in Foobar and it'll be perfect. As a matter of fact, it's difficult to tell the difference even between FLAC and MP3.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2023
Categories |